《南非歷史期刊》得到了充分認(rèn)可、同行評審，被國際公認(rèn)為南非出版的首要歷史期刊，促進(jìn)了該國以及南部非洲地區(qū)的重大歷史學(xué)術(shù)研究。作為南部非洲歷史學(xué)會的期刊，它為南非歷史的原始思考提供了一個高質(zhì)量的媒介，并因此塑造并繼續(xù)為定義該地區(qū)的歷史編纂做出貢獻(xiàn)。《南非歷史雜志》每季度出版一期，出版了各種各樣的材料，包括從前殖民地社區(qū)到21世紀(jì)早期轉(zhuǎn)型社會的相關(guān)問題，歷史的實踐和教學(xué)以及關(guān)于遺產(chǎn)和紀(jì)念過去的辯論。它包括突破性的創(chuàng)新研究、一般歷史和歷史編纂綜述、歷史辯論和回訪、對歷史學(xué)家的采訪和對他們工作的反思、評論文章和重要書籍的評論。它定期發(fā)表專題文章，主題包括：“南非口述歷史”（2008年）；“讓我們談?wù)劙鄨D斯坦人”（2012年）；“茨瓦納歷史”（2014年）。雜志上發(fā)表的所有研究文章都經(jīng)過了嚴(yán)格的同行評審，基于最初的編輯篩選和至少兩名評審員的匿名評審。該期刊遵循“雙盲”的材料評價過程：作者的姓名不向推薦人披露，推薦人的身份也不向作者披露。我們要求我們的推薦人編寫有用的報告，充分激發(fā)他們對出版物的建議。該期刊在南非獲得完全認(rèn)證，列在湯森路透藝術(shù)與人文引文索引中，其內(nèi)容也相應(yīng)地被引用、注釋、索引和/或摘錄。

The South African Historical Journal is fully accredited, peer reviewed and internationally regarded as a premier history journal published in South Africa, promoting significant historical scholarship on the country as well as the southern African region. As the journal of the Southern African Historical Society, it has provided a high-quality medium for original thinking about South African history and has thus shaped – and continues to contribute towards defining – the historiography of the region.Published quarterly, the South African Historical Journal publishes a wide variety of material, encompassing issues ranging in time from those around pre-colonial communities to those pertinent to a society in transition in the early 21st century, the practice and teaching of history and debates about heritage and the commemoration of the past. It includes ground-breaking innovative research, general historical and historiographical overviews, historical debates and rejoinders, interviews with historians and reflections on their work, review articles and critical reviews of important books. It regularly publishes articles in special issues on themes such as: ‘Oral Histories in South Africa’ (2008); ‘Let’s Talk About Bantustans’ (2012); and ’Tswana History’ (2014)All research articles published in the journal have undergone rigorous peer review, based on initial editor screening and anonymized refereeing by at least two referees. The Journal follows a ‘double-blind’ process of evaluation of material: the names of authors are not disclosed to referees, and the identities of referees are not revealed to authors. We request that our referees compile helpful reports which fully motivate their recommendation regarding publication.The Journal is fully accredited in South Africa, it is listed in the Thomson Reuters Arts & Humanities Citation Index and its contents are accordingly cited, annotated, indexed and/or abstracted.