《高溫》是一本國際同行評議期刊，發表理論和實驗研究人員的原創論文和評論。該雜志涉及低溫等離子體的性質和過程;物質的熱物理性質，包括純物質、混合物及合金;臨界點附近的性質，狀態方程;相平衡;傳熱傳質現象，特別是由強迫對流和自由對流引起的傳熱傳質現象;沸騰和冷凝、輻射和復雜的傳熱過程;實驗方法和儀器;電力工程應用高溫設備等。該雜志反映了當前熱物理研究的趨勢。介紹了當今復雜傳熱過程、熱過程、氣體動力學過程、傳熱傳質過程的實驗和理論研究結果，以及高溫介質特性理論描述的最新進展。同行評審《高溫》是一本同行評議的期刊。我們使用單一的盲同行評審格式。我們的評審員團隊包括內部和外部的評審員(90%)。2017年從提交到首次評審的平均周期為5-40天，從首次評審到驗收的平均周期為60天。2017年投稿退稿率為33%。接受發表文章的最終決定由編輯委員會作出。被邀請的審稿人因利益沖突，認為不符合審稿條件或者不能審稿的，應當及時通知審稿人，并予以拒絕。審稿人應以一種合理合理的方式清晰地闡述自己的觀點，這樣作者才能利用審稿人的觀點來完善稿件。必須避免對作者的個人批評。評論者應該顯示發表的一篇評論(我)任何相關的工作沒有被引用的作者,(2)任何已報道在以前的出版物和沒有適當的參考或引用,(2)任何實質性相似或重疊與其他手稿(發表或未發表)的個人知識。

High Temperature is an international peer reviewed journal that publishes original papers and reviews written by theoretical and experimental researchers. The journal deals with properties and processes in low-temperature plasma; thermophysical properties of substances including pure materials, mixtures and alloys; the properties in the vicinity of the critical point, equations of state; phase equilibrium; heat and mass transfer phenomena, in particular, by forced and free convections; processes of boiling and condensation, radiation, and complex heat transfer; experimental methods and apparatuses; high-temperature facilities for power engineering applications, etc. The journal reflects the current trends in thermophysical research. It presents the results of present-day experimental and theoretical studies in the processes of complex heat transfer, thermal, gas dynamic processes, and processes of heat and mass transfer, as well as the latest advances in the theoretical description of the properties of high-temperature media.PEER REVIEWHigh Temperature is a peer reviewed journal. We use a single blind peer review format. Our team of reviewers includes reviewers, both internal and external (90%). The average period from submission to first decision in 2017 was 5-40 days, and that from first decision to acceptance was 60 days. The rejection rate for submitted manuscripts in 2017 was 33%. The final decision on the acceptance of an article for publication is made by the Editorial Board.Any invited reviewer who feels unqualified or unable to review the manuscript due to the conflict of interests should promptly notify the editors and decline the invitation. Reviewers should formulate their statements clearly in a sound and reasoned way so that authors can use reviewer’s arguments to improve the manuscript. Personal criticism of the authors must be avoided. Reviewers should indicate in a review (i) any relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors, (ii) anything that has been reported in previous publications and not given appropriate reference or citation, (ii) any substantial similarity or overlap with any other manuscript (published or unpublished) of which they have personal knowledge.